Thanks again to Open Source Security, inc and Embecosm for their ongoing support for this project.
74 pull-requests were merged this month, with multiple internal compiler error fixes thanks to the fuzzing work done by Matthias Krüger, which helped expose multiple invalid code paths in the compiler. Thank you!
We also spent some time getting our mininum supported Rust version down
to Rust 1.49 for our Rust components. As a reminder, Rust 1.49 is the
version that gccrs
currently targets, and getting our own Rust
components compilable with this version also means getting closer and
closer to gccrs
compiling its own components - an objective we will
pursue as soon as we are able to compile the Rust standard library. This
also enables for more testing on less common systems, as certain
versions of Darwin or Ubuntu still in use by our community only have
access to older Rust installations.
We are still working on developing new features and upstreaming them in
time for the GCC 15.1 release. The cutoff date for the branch is yet to
be announced, but should happen soon. We have continued work on our
milestones, and have spent a lot of time getting further and further
into the compilation of core
. This opened new issues on the project
with our macro expansion and name resolution, which we quickly fixed in
the last few weeks.
One of the focus of this month was adding support for the
min_specialization
feature, which you can learn more about
here.
In its current form, gccrs
only supports a subset of
min_specialization
, which itself is a subset of specialization
in
general. We are required to support parts of this feature as it used in
core
to improve runtime performance in certain cases.
For example, the machinery responsible for implementing
Iterator::zip
(as a reminder, Iterator::zip
enables you to tie together two
iterators and advance them as the same time) lives in the
core::iter::adapters::ZipImpl
trait, whose definition looks like this:
// Zip specialization trait
#[doc(hidden)]
trait ZipImpl<A, B> {
type Item;
fn new(a: A, b: B) -> Self;
fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item>;
fn size_hint(&self) -> (usize, Option<usize>);
fn nth(&mut self, n: usize) -> Option<Self::Item>;
fn next_back(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item>
where
A: DoubleEndedIterator + ExactSizeIterator,
B: DoubleEndedIterator + ExactSizeIterator;
// This has the same safety requirements as `Iterator::__iterator_get_unchecked`
unsafe fn get_unchecked(&mut self, idx: usize) -> <Self as Iterator>::Item
where
Self: Iterator + TrustedRandomAccess;
}
If we keep reading through the file, we can see two implementations for this trait:
impl<A, B> ZipImpl<A, B> for Zip<A, B>
where
A: Iterator,
B: Iterator,
{ /* ... */ }
// and ...
#[doc(hidden)]
impl<A, B> ZipImpl<A, B> for Zip<A, B>
where
A: TrustedRandomAccess + Iterator,
B: TrustedRandomAccess + Iterator,
{ /* ... */ }
In one case, the implementation is more specialized and adds an extra
bound - TrustedRandomAccess
. Without specialization, these two
implementations are ambiguous, as they contain similar bounds. But by
using specialization, the core
library is able to provide a default,
safe and slower implementation of zip
while also providing a fast one
where possible, for example if the iterators support trusted random
access, meaning it supports efficent and safe random index accesses.
The method next
for these two implementations of ZipImpl
thus look
like the following:
impl<A, B> ZipImpl<A, B> for Zip<A, B>
where
A: Iterator,
B: Iterator,
{
#[inline]
default fn next(&mut self) -> Option<(A::Item, B::Item)> {
let x = self.a.next()?;
let y = self.b.next()?;
Some((x, y))
}
}
// and...
impl<A, B> ZipImpl<A, B> for Zip<A, B>
where
A: TrustedRandomAccess + Iterator,
B: TrustedRandomAccess + Iterator,
{
#[inline]
fn next(&mut self) -> Option<(A::Item, B::Item)> {
if self.index < self.len {
let i = self.index;
self.index += 1;
// SAFETY: `i` is smaller than `self.len`, thus smaller than `self.a.len()` and `self.b.len()`
unsafe {
Some((self.a.__iterator_get_unchecked(i), self.b.__iterator_get_unchecked(i)))
}
} else if A::may_have_side_effect() && self.index < self.a.size() {
// match the base implementation's potential side effects
// SAFETY: we just checked that `self.index` < `self.a.len()`
unsafe {
self.a.__iterator_get_unchecked(self.index);
}
self.index += 1;
None
} else {
None
}
}
}
In the more specific method, the behavior is the same, but the
implementation makes use of extra type information to provide faster
runtime performance when selecting the next items to iterate on. With
the work done this month, gccrs
is now able to select these faster
methods without producing an “ambiguous method resolution” error. While
specialization is not used in Rust-for-Linux, it is important that we
are able to resolve to the same methods as rustc
when compiling code.
This will also make for more optimized binaries and a faster kernel once
we are able to compile Rust-for-Linux. In order to fully support
min_specialization
however, we would need to implement a new algorithm
for deciding between two default
functions and choosing the most
specific one, which would require the development of a new decision tree
and the associated algorithms. This is not required for core
or
Rust-for-Linux, and will thus be worked on at a later date.
We will have our next monthly community call on the 22nd of April at 9am UTC. You can subscribe to our calendar to see when the next one will be held. The call is open to everyone, even if you would just like to sit-in and listen. You can also subscribe to our mailing-list or join our Zulip chat to be notified of upcoming events.
core
PR3734issue-2812.rs
PR3701macro6.rs
PR3700#![feature(min_specialization)]
PR3678rust-macro-builtins-log-debug.cc
PR3604prelude
to lang_prelude
PR3603macros/mbe/macro43.rs
PR3527const_generics_3.rs
PR3521#[track_caller]
PR3520StructExprFieldIdentifier
handling
PR3512self-path2.rs
PR3511compile/torture/*.rs
tests
PR3498cfg()
in core
PR3494let-else
statements
PR3468Category | Last Month | This Month | Delta |
---|---|---|---|
TODO | 294 | 493 | +199 |
In Progress | 93 | 119 | +26 |
Completed | 981 | 1035 | +54 |
Category | Last Month | This Month | Delta |
---|---|---|---|
TODO | 102 | 218 | +116 |
In Progress | 32 | 55 | -23 |
Completed | 477 | 510 | +33 |
TestCases | Last Month | This Month | Delta |
---|---|---|---|
Passing | 9762 | 10296 | +534 |
Failed | - | - | - |
XFAIL | 114 | 81 | -33 |
XPASS | - | - | - |
Milestone | Last Month | This Month | Delta | Start Date | Completion Date | Target | Target GCC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name resolution 2.0 rework | 28% | 49% | +21% | 1st Jun 2024 | - | 1st Apr 2025 | GCC 15.1 |
Macro expansion | 86% | 90% | +4% | 1st Jun 2024 | - | 1st Jan 2025 | GCC 15.1 |
Remaining typecheck issues | 88% | 98% | +10% | 21st Oct 2024 | - | 1st Mar 2025 | GCC 15.1 |
cfg-core | 75% | 100% | +25% | 1st Dec 2024 | 24th Mar 2025 | 1st Mar 2025 | GCC 15.1 |
Codegen fixes | 10% | 100% | +90% | 7th Oct 2024 | 1st Apr 2025 | 1st Mar 2025 | GCC 15.1 |
blackbox intrinsic | 50% | 75% | +25% | 28th Oct 2024 | - | 28th Jan 2025 | GCC 15.1 |
let-else | 30% | 60% | +30% | 28th Jan 2025 | - | 28th Feb 2025 | GCC 15.1 |
Specialization | 0% | 100% | +100% | 1st Jan 2025 | 1st Apr 2025 | 1st Mar 2025 | GCC 15.1 |
cfg-rfl | 0% | 100% | +100% | 7th Jan 2025 | 19th Mar 2025 | 15th Feb 2025 | GCC 15.1 |
Downgrade to Rust 1.49 | 0% | 100% | +100% | 14th Mar 2025 | 26th Mar 2025 | 1st Apr 2025 | GCC 15.1 |
Explicit generics with impl Trait | 0% | 40% | +40% | 28th Feb 2025 | - | 28th Mar 2025 | GCC 15.1 |
Upcoming Milestone | Last Month | This Month | Delta | Start Date | Completion Date | Target | Target GCC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unstable RfL features | 0% | 0% | - | 7th Jan 2025 | - | 1st Aug 2025 | GCC 16.1 |
offsetof!() builtin macro | 0% | 0% | - | 15th Mar 2025 | - | 15th Aug 2025 | GCC 16.1 |
Generic Associated Types | 0% | 0% | - | 15th Mar 2025 | - | 15th Jun 2025 | GCC 16.1 |
RfL const generics | 0% | 0% | - | 1st May 2025 | - | 15th Jun 2025 | GCC 16.1 |
frontend plugin hooks | 0% | 0% | - | 15th May 2025 | - | 7th Jul 2025 | GCC 16.1 |
Handling the testsuite issues | 0% | 0% | - | 15th Sep 2024 | - | 15th Sep 2025 | GCC 16.1 |
main shim | 0% | 0% | - | 28th Jul 2025 | - | 15th Sep 2025 | GCC 16.1 |
Past Milestone | Last Month | This Month | Delta | Start Date | Completion Date | Target | Target GCC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data Structures 1 - Core | 100% | 100% | - | 30th Nov 2020 | 27th Jan 2021 | 29th Jan 2021 | GCC 14.1 |
Control Flow 1 - Core | 100% | 100% | - | 28th Jan 2021 | 10th Feb 2021 | 26th Feb 2021 | GCC 14.1 |
Data Structures 2 - Generics | 100% | 100% | - | 11th Feb 2021 | 14th May 2021 | 28th May 2021 | GCC 14.1 |
Data Structures 3 - Traits | 100% | 100% | - | 20th May 2021 | 17th Sep 2021 | 27th Aug 2021 | GCC 14.1 |
Control Flow 2 - Pattern Matching | 100% | 100% | - | 20th Sep 2021 | 9th Dec 2021 | 29th Nov 2021 | GCC 14.1 |
Macros and cfg expansion | 100% | 100% | - | 1st Dec 2021 | 31st Mar 2022 | 28th Mar 2022 | GCC 14.1 |
Imports and Visibility | 100% | 100% | - | 29th Mar 2022 | 13th Jul 2022 | 27th May 2022 | GCC 14.1 |
Const Generics | 100% | 100% | - | 30th May 2022 | 10th Oct 2022 | 17th Oct 2022 | GCC 14.1 |
Initial upstream patches | 100% | 100% | - | 10th Oct 2022 | 13th Nov 2022 | 13th Nov 2022 | GCC 14.1 |
Upstream initial patchset | 100% | 100% | - | 13th Nov 2022 | 13th Dec 2022 | 19th Dec 2022 | GCC 14.1 |
Update GCC’s master branch | 100% | 100% | - | 1st Jan 2023 | 21st Feb 2023 | 3rd Mar 2023 | GCC 14.1 |
Final set of upstream patches | 100% | 100% | - | 16th Nov 2022 | 1st May 2023 | 30th Apr 2023 | GCC 14.1 |
Borrow Checking 1 | 100% | 100% | - | TBD | 8th Jan 2024 | 15th Aug 2023 | GCC 14.1 |
Procedural Macros 1 | 100% | 100% | - | 13th Apr 2023 | 6th Aug 2023 | 6th Aug 2023 | GCC 14.1 |
GCC 13.2 Release | 100% | 100% | - | 13th Apr 2023 | 22nd Jul 2023 | 15th Jul 2023 | GCC 14.1 |
GCC 14 Stage 3 | 100% | 100% | - | 1st Sep 2023 | 20th Sep 2023 | 1st Nov 2023 | GCC 14.1 |
GCC 14.1 Release | 100% | 100% | - | 2nd Jan 2024 | 2nd Jun 2024 | 15th Apr 2024 | GCC 14.1 |
formatargs!() support | 100% | 100% | - | 15th Feb 2024 | - | 1st Apr 2024 | GCC 14.1 |
GCC 14.2 | 100% | 100% | - | 7th Jun 2024 | 15th Jun 2024 | 15th Jun 2024 | GCC 14.2 |
GCC 15.1 | 100% | 100% | - | 21st Jun 2024 | 31st Jun 2024 | 1st Jul 2024 | GCC 15.1 |
Unhandled attributes | 100% | 100% | - | 1st Jul 2024 | 15th Aug 2024 | 15th Aug 2024 | GCC 15.1 |
Inline assembly | 100% | 100% | - | 1st Jun 2024 | 26th Aug 2024 | 15th Sep 2024 | GCC 15.1 |
Rustc Testsuite Adaptor | 100% | 100% | - | 1st Jun 2024 | 26th Aug 2024 | 15th Sep 2024 | GCC 15.1 |
Borrow checker improvements | 100% | 100% | - | 1st Jun 2024 | 26th Aug 2024 | 15th Sep 2024 | GCC 15.1 |
Deref and DerefMut improvements | 100% | 100% | - | 28th Sep 2024 | 25th Oct 2024 | 28th Dec 2024 | GCC 15.1 |
Indexing fixes | 100% | 100% | - | 21st Jul 2024 | 25th Dec 2024 | 15th Nov 2024 | GCC 15.1 |
Iterator fixes | 100% | 100% | - | 21st Jul 2024 | 25th Dec 2024 | 15th Nov 2024 | GCC 15.1 |
Auto traits improvements | 100% | 100% | - | 15th Sep 2024 | 20th Jan 2025 | 21st Dec 2024 | GCC 15.1 |
Lang items | 100% | 100% | - | 1st Jul 2024 | 10th Jan 2025 | 21st Nov 2024 | GCC 15.1 |
alloc parser issues | 100% | 100% | - | 7th Jan 2025 | 31st Jun 2024 | 28th Jan 2025 | GCC 15.1 |
std parser issues | 100% | 100% | - | 7th Jan 2025 | 31st Jun 2024 | 28th Jan 2025 | GCC 16.1 |
Question mark operator | 100% | 100% | - | 15th Dec 2024 | 21st Feb 2025 | 21st Feb 2025 | GCC 15.1 |
derive(PartialOrd)
and derive(PartialEq)
implementationWe have now entered Stage 3 of GCC development, and all of the patches we needed to get upstreamed have been upstreamed. The risk that were outlined here are no longer present, and we are focusing on getting as many features implemented and upstreamed as possible.